Decisions

A collection of judgments of the Ontario Court of Justice, primarily released after April 1, 2004, is posted on CanLII. The CanLII website is not an exhaustive source of judgments of the Ontario Court of Justice. The official version of the reasons for judgment is the signed original or handwritten endorsement in the court file. In the event that there is a question about the content of a judgment, the original in the court file takes precedence.

Judgments are available in the language provided.

Copies of judgments of the Ontario Court of Justice can be obtained by contacting the respective court office where the matter was heard. A photocopy charge is payable. Judgments are also available on a number of subscription based services such as LexisNexis® QuicklawTM and WestlawNext® Canada.

Subscribe to the RSS Feed for Ontario Court of Justice Decisions

Ontario Court of Justice Recent Decisions

  • 2025-04-22 R. v. B.H., 2025 ONCJ 222 (CanLII)
    Key Words:
  • 2025-04-17 R. v. Habte, 2025 ONCJ 216 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Constitution — Charter breaches — Arbitrary detention — Unreasonable search and seizure — Right to counsel — Exclusion of evidence — Was the applicant’s detention and search conducted in violation of sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Charter? — Framework for assessing Charter breaches and remedies under section 24(2) of the Charter<br />Rights and freedoms — Arbitrary detention — Section 9 of the Charter — Psychological and physical detention — Investigative detention — Was the applicant’s detention arbitrary under section 9 of the Charter? — Test for arbitrary detention from R. v. Grant and R. v. Le<br />Evidence — Unreasonable search and seizure — Section 8 of the Charter — Warrantless search — Plain view doctrine — Cannabis Control Act — Did the search of the applicant’s person and vehicle violate section 8 of the Charter? — Presumption of unreasonableness for warrantless searches<br />Rights and freedoms — Right to counsel — Section 10(b) of the Charter — Delay in informing of rights — Interrogation before counsel — Did the police fail to provide the applicant with the right to counsel without delay? — Immediate provision of rights to counsel under R. v. Suberu<br />Criminal procedure — Exclusion of evidence — Section 24(2) of the Charter — Seriousness of Charter breaches — Impact on accused’s rights — Public confidence in the administration of justice — Should the evidence obtained through Charter breaches be excluded? — Balancing test from R. v. Grant
  • 2025-04-17 Ontario (Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development) v. The Econo-Rack Group Inc., 2025 ONCJ 213 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Workplace health and safety — Fair trial — Particulars — Provincial Offences Act — Defendant charged under Occupational Health and Safety Act for failing to ensure prescribed measures were carried out — Whether particulars are necessary to ensure a fair trial — Section 35 of the Provincial Offences Act applied — Motion for particulars dismissed as unnecessary for trial fairness<br />Workplace health and safety — Sufficiency of information — Charges under Occupational Health and Safety Act — Defendant alleged to have failed to ensure safe transportation of materials — Whether count #1 sufficiently identifies the circumstances of the alleged offence — Court held count #1 factually sufficient under section 25(6) of the Provincial Offences Act<br />Statutory interpretation — Occupational Health and Safety Act — Ontario Regulation 851, section 45(b) — Conjunctive test — Whether section 45(b) requires proof of both subsections (i) and (ii) — Court declined to decide at this stage, finding it unnecessary for the motion on particulars
  • 2025-04-17 R. v. Singh, 2025 ONCJ 214 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Criminal procedure — Jurisdiction of non-trial judge — Remote testimony — Application under section 714.1 of the Criminal Code — Whether a judge who is not the trial judge has jurisdiction to decide an application for remote testimony — Interpretation of “the court” in section 714.1 — Practical considerations for judicial efficiency — Decision: Any judge with jurisdiction in the judicial district may decide a section 714.1 application<br />Evidence — Remote testimony — Sexual assault trial — Complainant residing in another province — Crown application under section 714.1 of the Criminal Code — Factors considered: location and personal circumstances of the witness, costs, nature of evidence, suitability of remote location, accused’s right to a fair trial, seriousness of the offence — Presumption of in-person testimony not displaced — Application dismissed
  • 2025-04-17 R. v. Green, 2025 ONCJ 215 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Criminal procedure — Sentencing — Child pornography offences — Denunciation and deterrence — Totality principle — Repeat offender sentenced to 8 years’ imprisonment, reduced to 2 years after pre-trial custody credit — Whether a penitentiary term is warranted for repeat child pornography offences — Criminal Code, ss.718, 718.01, 718.2(c), 719(3.1)<br />Evidence — Long-term offender designation — Psychiatric evidence — Risk of reoffending — Expert testimony on pedophilia and substance use — Whether the accused should be designated a long-term offender and subjected to a 10-year long-term supervision order — Criminal Code, s.753.1<br />Criminal procedure — Pre-trial custody — Enhanced credit — Harsh conditions of incarceration — Lockdowns, triple bunking, and COVID-19 outbreaks at Toronto South Detention Centre — Whether enhanced credit for pre-trial custody is warranted — Criminal Code, s.719(3.1); R v Duncan<br />Criminal procedure — Ancillary orders — Lifetime prohibition under s.161 — SOIRA order for life — Weapons prohibition — Restrictions on Internet use and access to public spaces — Whether ancillary orders are appropriate and proportionate — Criminal Code, ss.109, 161, 490.012, 490.013
Ontario Court of Justice