Decisions

A collection of judgments of the Ontario Court of Justice, primarily released after April 1, 2004, is posted on CanLII. The CanLII website is not an exhaustive source of judgments of the Ontario Court of Justice. The official version of the reasons for judgment is the signed original or handwritten endorsement in the court file. In the event that there is a question about the content of a judgment, the original in the court file takes precedence.

Judgments are available in the language provided.

Copies of judgments of the Ontario Court of Justice can be obtained by contacting the respective court office where the matter was heard. A photocopy charge is payable. Judgments are also available on a number of subscription based services such as LexisNexis® QuicklawTM and WestlawNext® Canada.

Subscribe to the RSS Feed for Ontario Court of Justice Decisions

Ontario Court of Justice Recent Decisions

  • 2026-06-16 R. v. T.S., 2026 ONCJ 354 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Criminal and statutory offences — Youth sentencing — Fit sentence — Serious sexual assault with brief contact — Whether a probationary sentence is fit given diminished moral blameworthiness and significant mental illness — Accountability, rehabilitation and public protection balanced — Structured supports and supervision emphasised — Two‑year probation with targeted conditions imposed — Probation ordered<br />Criminal and statutory offences — Youth sentencing — Community programs — Whether probation can incorporate an Intensive Support and Supervision Program under s. 42(2)(l) when access is delayed — Program accepted as suitable yet not immediately available — Probation to include ISSP for 18 months commencing upon placement availability — Structured community disposition endorsed — Probation incorporating ISSP ordered<br />Criminal and statutory offences — Youth sentencing — Custody as last resort — Whether custody should be imposed where an appropriate community‑based resource is delayed — Custody found disproportionate in light of youth, mental health, and rehabilitative focus — Least restrictive sentence capable of achieving purposes selected — Community‑based disposition preferred — Custody not imposed<br />Criminal and statutory offences — Sentencing orders — Ancillary orders — Whether ancillary orders should issue with a community‑based disposition — Identification sample and public safety conditions addressed — DNA order made pursuant to governing regime — Two‑year weapons prohibition imposed — Ancillary orders issued
  • 2026-06-16 R. v. Saunders-White, 2026 ONCJ 356 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Rights and freedoms — Charter rights — Trial within a reasonable time — Section 11(b) and Jordan 2016 SCC 27 — Whether net delay exceeded the 18‑month presumptive ceiling — Late disclosure and rescheduling beyond Jordan ceiling assessed — Crown failed to rebut presumption of unreasonableness — Remedy under s. 11(b) applied — Application granted — Proceedings stayed<br />Procedure — Delay attribution — Defence delay — Apportionment of delay after adjournment of first trial — Whether defence unavailability for pre‑trial motion dates caused additional delay — Guidance from Jacques‑Taylor 2026 SCC 20 and Vrbanic 2026 SCC 19 — 75/25 split for adjournment period and full allocation for motion unavailability — Defence delay partly attributed<br />Procedure — Exceptional circumstances — Discrete events and complexity — Whether limited judicial availability and case complexity justified above‑ceiling delay — Discrete event would double‑count already allocated delay — No voluminous disclosure or extensive expert evidence — Crown mitigation efforts insufficient — Kinamore 2025 SCC 19, Barton 2019 SCC 33, Seaboyer considered — Exceptional circumstances rejected
  • 2026-06-16 R. v. Hoque, 2026 ONCJ 359 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Criminal and statutory offences — Sentencing — Discharge — Whether a discharge is fit where the offender abused a vulnerable person — Primary consideration to denunciation and deterrence under s. 718.04 — Position of trust toward a non-verbal resident emphasised — Proportionality to gravity of offence and responsibility assessed — Discharge refused<br />Criminal and statutory offences — Sentencing — Conditional sentence — Should a custodial sentence be served in the community — Community safety and consistency with sentencing principles assessed — Minimum sentence capable of meeting denunciation and deterrence identified — Ninety days custody by way of conditional sentence followed by probation — Conditional sentence imposed<br />Criminal and statutory offences — Ancillary orders — DNA and firearms prohibition — Primary designated offence requiring DNA sample for national databank — Order under s. 110 prohibiting possession of firearms and related items for five years — Time granted to pay victim surcharge — Ancillary orders made
  • 2026-06-15 R. v. Partridge, 2026 ONCJ 348 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Criminal and statutory offences — Impaired driving — Elements of offence — Criminal Code, s. 320.14(1)(a) — Whether the accused was impaired by drugs while operating a motor vehicle — Civilian observations, police observations, and DRE findings considered — Toxicology corroboration of multiple intoxicants — Proof beyond a reasonable doubt established — Conviction entered<br />Evidence — Identification — Eyewitness identification — Whether the Crown proved the identity of the driver beyond a reasonable doubt — Frailties of in‑dock identification addressed, R. v. Jack referenced — Continuous observations by store employees, licence plate recorded, pharmacist recognition — Police confirmation upon arrest and at detachment — Identity proven<br />Evidence — Expert evidence — Drug Recognition Expert and toxicology — Weight of DRE and toxicology evidence in establishing drug impairment — DIE results detailing signs consistent with central nervous system stimulant, narcotic analgesic and cannabis — CFS blood analysis confirming multiple substances including carfentanil and fentanyl — Admissibility unchallenged, weight accepted — Impairment established
  • 2026-06-15 R. v. Torabi, 2026 ONCJ 349 (CanLII)
    Key Words: Rights and freedoms — Charter, Search and seizure — Facial review of warrant — Could the issuing justice have issued the search warrant on the ITO? — Narrow scope of review, could not would, totality considered — Credible and reliable information permitting reasonable inferences identified — Presumptive validity of warrant maintained — Warrant could have issued<br />Rights and freedoms — Charter, Search and seizure — Stale-dated information — Did the 47‑day interval render the intercepted-call information stale-dated? — Applicant’s spontaneous admission during private call found highly reliable — Nature of firearm supports inference of continuing presence — Contextual assessment of time and circumstances applied — Application dismissed<br />Rights and freedoms — Charter, Search and seizure — Reasonable grounds to believe — Criminal Code, s. 487(1)(b) — Was the reasonable grounds to believe threshold met on the ITO and reasonable inferences? — Credibly-based probability exceeding suspicion, not balance of probabilities — Inferences about possession and location reasonably drawn — Application dismissed<br />Rights and freedoms — Charter, Search and seizure — Competing inferences — Was the one‑gun theory a reasonable alternative inference that undermined reasonable grounds? — Affiant not required to negate every alternative inference — One‑gun theory speculative on evidentiary record — Separate firearms reasonably inferred from communications — Application dismissed
Ontario Court of Justice