Passer au contenu
Home     À propos de la Cour     Décisions de la Cour

Décisions de la Cour

Une série de jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice, pour la plupart rendus après le 1er octobre 2004, sont affichés sur le site Web de CanLII. Ce site n’est pas une source exhaustive de jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice. La version officielle des motifs de jugement est le document original signé ou l’endossement manuscrit dans le dossier de la Cour. S’il y a une question concernant le contenu d’un jugement, le document original dans le dossier de la Cour l’emporte.

Les jugements ne sont disponibles que dans la langue dans laquelle ils ont été rédigés.

On peut obtenir des copies des jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice en contactant les greffes respectifs où l’affaire a été entendue. Des frais de photocopie sont requis. On peut consulter ces jugements en s’abonnant à un service comme LexisNexis® QuicklawMC, et WestlawNextMDMD Canada.

Abonnez-vous au fil de nouvelles RSS afin de consulter les décisions de la Cour supérieure de justice

Cour supérieure de justice – Décisions récentes

  • 2026-10-19 D’Silva v Ilia, 2026 ONSC 5899 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: Family law — Domestic contracts — Setting aside — Fraud — Rule 25(19)(a)
  • 2026-10-15 Hooey v. Hurst et al., 2026 ONSC 5843 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: Contracts — Agreement of purchase and sale — Warranty — “Good working order” and knowledge requirement — Whether the sellers breached the warranty clause in Schedule “A” — Inference from post-closing oil leak weighed against pre-closing certified inspection — Ontario Building Code compliance not determinative — Breach of warranty claim dismissed
    Civil liability — Negligent misrepresentation — Reasonable reliance — Queen v. Cognos Inc., five-part test — Whether the sellers negligently misrepresented the heating system was in good working order — Certification by qualified technician and sellers’ evidence considered — Purchaser waived fuel-distributor report and did not pursue recommended investigations — Negligent misrepresentation claim dismissed
    Civil liability — Negligent building or renovations — Dangerous defects — Winnipeg Condominium Corporation No. 36 v. Bird Construction Co. duty — Whether the sellers negligently performed renovations causing dangerous defects — Responsibility for renovations and timing not proven — Ontario Building Code not treated as retroactive maintenance standard — Insufficient evidence that defects were dangerous — Negligent building claim dismissed
    Civil liability — Damages — Causation and betterment — Whether restoration quotation, out-of-pocket rent, and general damages were recoverable — No damages payable given findings on liability — Improvements beyond correcting deficiencies intermingled in the quotation — Causation of alternate accommodations unclear — General damages not granted — Claims dismissed
  • 2026-10-15 Our Muskoka Stakeholders Association v. Muskoka Lakes Association, 2026 ONSC 5588 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: Administrative law — Appeals and judicial oversight — Leave to appeal — Ontario Land Tribunal order and decision — Whether leave to appeal should be granted — Motion for leave to appeal in OLT Case No. OLT-24-000035 — Leave to appeal decision of the Ontario Land Tribunal reviewed — Motion dismissed
    Procedure — Costs — Costs on motion — Motion for leave to appeal dismissed — Whether costs payable by the moving party — Costs payable to responding parties — Partial indemnity costs referenced — Costs awarded and payable within thirty days — Costs ordered
  • 2026-10-15 Garofalo et al. v. Khanna et al., 2026 ONSC 5833 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: Procedure — Summary judgment — Rule 20.04, Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure — Hryniak v. Mauldin framework — Whether the record permits a fair and just determination without trial — Moving parties’ burden to show no genuine issue requiring a trial — Expanded fact-finding powers not determinative on this record — Motions dismissed
    Limitation periods — Discoverability — Limitations Act, 2002, ss. 4, 5(1), 5(2) — Whether claim discovered more than two years before proceeding — Material facts and “plausible inference of liability” standard, Grant Thornton LLP v. New Brunswick — Actual or constructive knowledge and due diligence disputed — Genuine issue requiring a trial — Motions dismissed
    Civil liability — Torts — Conspiracy — Unlawful conduct conspiracy elements, Agribrands Purina Canada Inc. v. Kasamekas — Whether there is evidence of acting in concert and unlawful conduct — Circumstantial evidence from mortgage transactions and relationships relied on — Credibility issues and red flags in the record — Genuine issue requiring a trial — Motions dismissed
  • 2026-10-14 Weinstein v. Serius XM Canada Inc., 2026 ONSC 5805 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: Procedure — Class proceedings — Certification motion — Class Proceedings Act, 1992, s. 5(1)(a) — Whether pleadings disclose a cause of action on a “plain and obvious” test — Rule 21.01, Rules of Civil Procedure analogy — No viable causes of action found on the pleadings — Certification dismissed
    Contracts — Consumer transactions — Unfair practices — Consumer Protection Act, 2002, s. 14 — Whether base price with asterisks and “Additional fees apply” is misleading or deceptive — “Credulous and inexperienced” consumer framework applied with readable qualifiers — Full amount payable disclosed before agreement — Certification dismissed
    Contracts — Consumer protection legislation — Extra-provincial claims — Whether reliance is a required material fact under other provinces’ consumer protection statutes — Claim invoking British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador legislation without pleading reliance — Ontario authorities denying certification where reliance omitted — Extra-provincial claims destined to fail — Certification dismissed
    Contracts — Restitution — Unjust enrichment — Whether unjust enrichment is barred by the subscription agreement, including an arbitration clause — Consumer Protection Act, 2002, s. 7(2) inapplicable to unjust enrichment — Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock juristic reason analysis, contract pleaded and not vitiated — Certification dismissed

Cour divisionnaire - Décisions récentes

  • 2026-10-19 NASH v. CIBC ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. et al, 2026 ONSC 5908 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: doesn — request — abandoned — days — adjournment
  • 2026-10-19 Drinnan v. Workplace Safety Insurance Appeal Tribunal, 2026 ONSC 5862 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: Administrative law — Judicial review — Statutory power of decision — Judicial Review Procedure Act, s. 2(1)2 — Whether WSIAT Emergency Management and Security letter is a statutory power of decision — Security decisions and procedures not a public function governed by statutory decision-making procedures — Letter not amenable to judicial review — Application quashed
    Administrative law — Judicial review — Timeliness — Judicial Review Procedure Act, s. 5 — Whether application is out of time — Application filed outside JRPA time limit for WSIAT decisions from May 2022 to March 2023 — Court discretion to extend time noted — Extension not appropriate given numerous deficiencies — Application quashed
    Procedure — Summary disposition — Rule 2.1.01 — Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 2.1.01 — Whether application is frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process on the face of the pleading — Court to look beyond drafting deficiencies — Fundamental error going to root of application — Notice of application quashed
    Criminal and statutory offences — Jurisdiction — Criminal Code allegations — Whether Divisional Court has jurisdiction where application alleges fraud and relies on the Criminal Code — Allegations of fraud raised in materials — Reliance on Criminal Code characterised as outside Divisional Court jurisdiction — Relief not available on judicial review — Application quashed
  • 2026-10-16 Steciuk v. Heffernan, 2026 ONSC 5732 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: writing — motion — leave — dismissed — costs
  • 2026-10-16 HMKRO et al. v. Wei. et al., 2026 ONSC 5733 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: reserved — inclusive — fixed — writing — panel
  • 2026-10-16 Unifirst Canada Ltd. / Unifirst Canada Ltee v. The Hamtor Group Inc., 2026 ONSC 5734 (CanLII)
    Mots-clés: formally — inclusive — fixed — writing — motion

Autres liens utiles: