Une série de jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice, pour la plupart rendus après le 1er octobre 2004, sont affichés sur le site Web de CanLII. Ce site n’est pas une source exhaustive de jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice. La version officielle des motifs de jugement est le document original signé ou l’endossement manuscrit dans le dossier de la Cour. S’il y a une question concernant le contenu d’un jugement, le document original dans le dossier de la Cour l’emporte.

Les jugements ne sont disponibles que dans la langue dans laquelle ils ont été rédigés.

On peut obtenir des copies des jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice en contactant les greffes respectifs où l’affaire a été entendue. Des frais de photocopie sont requis. On peut consulter ces jugements en s’abonnant à un service comme LexisNexis® Quicklaw^MC, et WestlawNextMD^MD Canada.

Abonnez-vous au fil de nouvelles RSS afin de consulter les décisions de la Cour supérieure de justice

• Cour supérieure de justice – Décisions récentes
• Cour supérieure de justice – Cour divisionnaire – Décisions récentes

Cour supérieure de justice – Décisions récentes

• 2026-03-27 North Buxton Community Church v. BMEC, 2026 ONSC 1592 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Property — Church property — Statutory vesting and trust — Are the plaintiffs the trustees entitled to be registered owner, or does the defendant church retain control under the deed and governance? — Deed linked trustees to the church and imposed express trusts — Land titles “qualified” title subject to statutory vesting — Congregants cannot take church property on withdrawal — Motion dismissed
  Limitation periods — Real Property Limitations Act — Accrual and recovery of land — Is the defendant church’s application to be registered owner out of time under ss. 4 and 15? — Vesting under s. 69 Land Titles Act is procedural, not an action to recover land — Statutory rights not extinguished — Application to register not statute‑barred — Motion dismissed
  Procedure — Land Titles — Fraudulent instrument and necessary party — Should the Application to Change Name be deleted as a fraudulent instrument and is the Director of Titles required? — Narrow interpretation of “fraudulent instrument” under Land Titles Act and Froom v. Lafontaine — Director of Titles not necessary — Application made in error deleted — Deletion ordered
  Statutory interpretation — Vesting statutes — Always speaking — Does the British Methodist Episcopal Church Act, 1913 vest title notwithstanding registration mechanics? — s. 3 and Schedule D vest property in the church for its benefit — Legislation Act, 2006 s. 4 confirms continuing effect — Trusts in Schedule B govern use and control — Statutory vesting affirmed
• 2026-03-27 3818187 Canada Inc. v. Corporation of the Township of Russell, 2026 ONSC 1876 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Costs — Motion to dismiss action for delay
• 2026-03-27 Swrjeski et al. v. Legris, 2026 ONSC 1862 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Property — Adverse possession — Real Property Limitations Act — Whether Applicants established adverse possession from 1955 to 1965 — Elements of actual possession intention to exclude and effective exclusion considered — Open notorious and continuous use found through pasturing cattle — Absence of evidence of exclusion of true owner — Application for possessory title dismissed — Cross-application granted
  Property — Boundaries — Mutual mistake — Did both predecessors share a mistaken belief about the boundary during the same continuous ten-year period? — Teis v. Ancaster and Wood v. Gateway considered — Statutory declaration and fence evidence insufficient — Possibility of permission inconsistent with mutual mistake — Possession not adverse to title holder — Declaration of absolute title for Respondents
  Evidence — Affidavits — Hearsay and opinion — Admissibility and weight of hearsay and lay or expert opinion in affidavits — Lawyer’s affidavit opinions inappropriate and given no weight — Surveyor’s opinions beyond expertise limited to surveying — Large portions of hearsay rejected — Focus confined to 1955–1965 evidence — Insufficient admissible evidence of adversity — Application dismissed
• 2026-03-27 Parsons v. Parsons, 2026 ONSC 1894 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Procedure — Res judicata — Duplicative litigation — Whether issues already decided in prior endorsement can be re‑litigated — Issue, once decided, should not generally be re‑litigated — Abuse of process principles applied to prevent duplicative proceedings — Bryton Capital Corp. GP Ltd. v. CIM Bayview Creek Inc., 2023 ONCA 363, Danyluk v. Ainsworth Technologies Inc., 2001 SCC 44 — Relief denied
  Procedure — Jurisdiction — Family Court — Courts of Justice Act, s. 21.8(1) — Whether proceedings shall be commenced, heard and determined in the Family Court where it has jurisdiction — Trust claim connected to equalization to proceed in Family Court — Court mindful to avoid multiplicity of legal proceedings — Prior determination that the trust claim shall be heard in Family Court — Relief denied
• 2026-03-26 Lipson v. Rosenthal, 2026 ONSC 184 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Family — Restraining orders — Family Law Act, s. 46 — Reasonable grounds to fear for safety — Whether emails, insults and pre-separation conduct meet objective test — Specific events and connection to present risk assessed, A.H. v. M.T. — Borderline case principles and criminal consequences considered — Evidence found insufficient and not compelling — Restraining order refused
  Family — Non-contact orders — Family Law Act, s. 47.1 — Whether interim non-contact order necessary to deal with application justly — Communications restricted to counsel — Geographic restrictions for former matrimonial home and workplace — Threat to allow creditors to attend residence considered — Limited duration with mechanism for extension set — Non-contact and geographic restriction order granted
  Procedure — Motions — Without notice — Whether leave to proceed without prior case conference appropriate — Urgency under r. 14(4.2) and probable serious consequences under r. 14(12)(d) — Short return timetable and ability to extend on consent or further order — Motion heard without notice and on urgent basis — Leave granted

Cour divisionnaire - Décisions récentes

• 2026-03-27 VIP Realty Inc. v. Keller Williams Realty, 2026 ONSC 1736 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: outlines — motion — costs — writing — leave
• 2026-03-27 Sadar v. Dentonia Place, 2026 ONSC 1739 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: orders — clarity — motion — lifting — dismissal
• 2026-03-27 1386146 Ontario Inc. v. 2520650 Ontario Inc., 2026 ONSC 1738 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: motion — reserved — fixed — writing — panel
• 2026-03-27 Di Iorio v. Your Community Realty Inc., 2026 ONSC 1740 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: aka — awarded — writing — motion — leave
• 2026-03-26 Sayers Foods Ltd. v. Sayers, 2026 ONSC 1829 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Construction — Prompt payment adjudication — Interest — Whether balance owing is calculated using contractual interest despite payment into court — Construction Act, ss. 6.9 and 13.19(3) applied — Payment into court stands as security and does not affect calculation — Interest accrues until payment to the payee — Statement of account from court accountant applied — Balance fixed
  Procedure — Judicial review — Ancillary jurisdiction — Does the Divisional Court have jurisdiction to settle interest and order payment out of court after dismissing the application? — Statutory court powers engaged to conclude issues arising from its stay and orders — Not an original payment order but enforcement consistent with Determination — Jurisdiction confirmed
  Construction — Prompt payment adjudication — Discretion to vary interest — Should interest under the Determination be relieved because funds were paid into court and proceedings took time? — Contract interest rate found by Adjudicator governs — Payment into court requested by payor did not stop interest clock — Compensation for loss of use of money recognised — Relief from interest denied