Une série de jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice, pour la plupart rendus après le 1er octobre 2004, sont affichés sur le site Web de CanLII. Ce site n’est pas une source exhaustive de jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice. La version officielle des motifs de jugement est le document original signé ou l’endossement manuscrit dans le dossier de la Cour. S’il y a une question concernant le contenu d’un jugement, le document original dans le dossier de la Cour l’emporte.

Les jugements ne sont disponibles que dans la langue dans laquelle ils ont été rédigés.

On peut obtenir des copies des jugements de la Cour supérieure de justice en contactant les greffes respectifs où l’affaire a été entendue. Des frais de photocopie sont requis. On peut consulter ces jugements en s’abonnant à un service comme LexisNexis® Quicklaw^MC, et WestlawNextMD^MD Canada.

Abonnez-vous au fil de nouvelles RSS afin de consulter les décisions de la Cour supérieure de justice

• Cour supérieure de justice – Décisions récentes
• Cour supérieure de justice – Cour divisionnaire – Décisions récentes

Cour supérieure de justice – Décisions récentes

• 2025-12-02 Cherry v. Nubury, 2025 ONSC 6670 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Procedure — Dismissal for delay — Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 24.01 — Whether delay is inordinate and inexcusable and prejudicial — Chronology of adjournments, non-attendance, missed deadlines, incomplete discoveries — Armstrong v. McCall applied — Substantial risk that a fair trial will not be possible — Action dismissed
  Procedure — Inherent jurisdiction — Abuse of process — Whether court may dismiss apart from r. 24.01 — Ticchiarelli v. Ticchiarelli cited on jurisdiction to dismiss where delay is inordinate, inexcusable and prejudicial — Discretion exercised to prevent abuse of process — Action dismissed
  Procedure — Adjournments and accommodation — Self-represented litigant — Health — Whether Plaintiff’s health issues and self-represented status excuse prolonged delay — Extensive accommodations provided, repeated timetable breaches persisted — Fairness to Defendants and accumulated prejudice outweigh further indulgence — Action dismissed
  Procedure — Prejudice and fair trial — Passage of time — Whether inference of prejudice unrebutted — Company out of business, witnesses retired, evidence stale, no Rule 53.03 expert reports — Substantial risk that a fair trial will not be possible established — Action dismissed
• 2025-12-02 Community Trust Company v. Peart-Williams et al., 2025 ONSC 6753 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Security interests — Mortgages — Enforcement on default — Entitlement to payment and possession upon maturity and non-payment — Whether defendants’ OPCA defences defeat a valid mortgage — Transfer of charge to plaintiff under standard charge terms — Amounts under mortgage established — Possession of property ordered — Summary judgment granted
  Procedure — Summary judgment — Rule 20 — No genuine issue requiring a trial — Hryniak v. Mauldin framework applied — Adjournment refused where matter marked peremptory — OPCA arguments characterised as abuse of process — Court satisfied it can fairly and justly adjudicate dispute — Summary judgment granted
  Rights and freedoms — Charter of Rights — Applicability — Whether Charter and s. 35 apply to private mortgage enforcement — Mortgagee not a government entity, Charter inapplicable — No evidentiary foundation of Indigenous rights engaged — Claims of breach of fiduciary obligations by the Crown unsupported — Constitutional arguments dismissed
  Evidence — Documents — Originals and electronic records — Is a “wet ink” original required to prove the mortgage? — Evidence Act, s. 12 and Electronic Commerce Act, 2000, s. 31 considered — Affidavit evidence uncontradicted and accepted — OPCA “wet ink” signature argument rejected — Summary judgment granted
• 2025-12-02 Ivaniv v Kokhanovskyy, 2025 ONSC 6696 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Procedure — Default judgments — Family Law Rules, r. 25(19) — Whether final orders should be set aside for inadequate notice — Mountain View Farms factors applied, including promptness and explanation for default — Notice by substituted email found inadequate — Interests of justice analysis favours relief — Prior costs orders addressed — Orders set aside
  Family — Matrimonial home — Beneficial ownership — Whether transfer of title to the matrimonial home should stand — Competing evidence on down payment and carrying costs — Lack of evidence explaining title in respondent’s name — Defence has an air of reality under Mountain View — Arguable defence established — Orders set aside
  Family — Child support — Income imputation — Whether income imputed for child support exceeds respondent’s actual income — Notices of assessment contrasted with imputed income — Possibility of unreported income noted but not determined — Defence on quantum has an air of reality — Arguable defence established — Orders set aside
  Procedure — Good faith and prejudice — Clean hands — Whether delay, conduct, and prejudice weigh against relief — Self-represented status and procedural posture considered — No bad faith found — Prejudice to respondent if motion dismissed outweighs prejudice to applicant if allowed — Interests of justice favour relief — No costs ordered on motion — Orders set aside
• 2025-12-02 R. v. Romano, 2025 ONSC 6734 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Criminal and statutory offences — Motor vehicle offences — Failure to Stop After Accident Causing Death — Criminal Code, s. 320.16(1), (3) — Whether the accused was reckless as to striking a person and as to resulting death — Duties to stop, identify, and offer assistance — Recklessness distinguished from wilful blindness per Sansregret and Fox — Conviction entered
  Evidence — Circumstantial evidence — Inferences — Whether circumstantial evidence supports the only reasonable inference of recklessness — Debris field, significant vehicle damage, boot on shoulder, absence of guardrails — Totality of evidence approach per Villaroman and Choudhury — Singular inference of recklessness drawn — Guilt proven beyond a reasonable doubt
  Evidence — Credibility and reliability — W.(D.) methodology — Whether exculpatory portions of the accused’s statements are accepted or raise a reasonable doubt — Statements inconsistent with objective evidence and trial admissions — No reliance on fabrication doctrine per O’Connor and Al‑Enzi — Exculpatory account rejected in context — Conviction sustained
• 2025-12-02 Smiley et al. v. Valour Group Inc. et al., 2025 ONSC 6736 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Procedure — Venue and forum — Inherent jurisdiction — Whether the Superior Court may address inappropriate venue absent a party’s motion — Rule 13.1.02 considered with rule 13.1.01 — Authorities applied, BFT Mortgage Services Inc. v. Getz, RBC v Gill — Court’s power to control its own process affirmed — Proceeding stayed and transfer motion directed
  Procedure — Venue and forum — Fair hearing — Rule 13.1.02(2)(a) — Whether allegations of bias justify choosing a venue with no rational connection — Frequent litigant and community presence insufficient — Test for reasonable apprehension of bias not met — Courts routinely hear matters involving well known parties — Proceeding stayed and transfer motion directed
  Procedure — Venue and forum — Transfer factors and forum shopping — Rule 13.1.02(2) factors applied — Whether none of the factors favour the chosen venue — No rational connection to Hamilton — Consolidated Civil Provincial Practice Direction and RSJ role emphasised — The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. The Other End cited — Forum shopping discouraged — Proceeding stayed and transfer motion directed

Cour divisionnaire - Décisions récentes

• 2025-12-01 Saeed v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2025 ONSC 6485 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Administrative law — Judicial review — Procedural fairness — Applicant sought judicial review of ICRC decision requiring completion of SCERP — Allegations of procedural unfairness, including biased Assessor and skewed chart selection — Whether ICRC decision was reasonable and procedurally fair — Standard of review of reasonableness applied — Baker factors for procedural fairness considered — Decision upheld as reasonable and procedurally fair
  Health — Professional regulation — Remediation orders — ICRC ordered Applicant to complete SCERP due to concerns about clinical care and record keeping — Whether ICRC decision was reasonable — Applicant acknowledged deficiencies in record keeping and judgment in specific cases — ICRC’s decision found reasonable based on evidence and statutory discretion
  Evidence — Administrative decision-making — Relevance of evidence — Applicant alleged ICRC failed to consider relevant evidence, including Assessor’s bias and skewed chart selection — ICRC addressed concerns about chart selection and Assessor’s errors — Decision found reasonable as ICRC considered all relevant evidence and submissions
  Professional responsibility — Assessor qualifications — Applicant challenged Assessor’s qualifications to evaluate general practice anesthesiology — ICRC determined Assessor’s expertise sufficient to evaluate standard of care for sedation in outpatient settings — ICRC entitled to rely on Assessor’s report while exercising discretion to accept or reject findings
• 2025-11-28 Royal LePage RCR Realty Brokerage v. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, 2025 ONSC 6276 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Administrative law — Judicial review — Human Rights Tribunal decisions — Standard of review — Reasonableness standard applied to Tribunal’s refusal to reconsider default decision — Whether Tribunal’s reliance on deeming provisions in its Rules of Procedure was reasonable — Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 — Ontario (Health) v. Association of Ontario Midwives, 2022 ONCA 458 — Tribunal’s decision quashed due to unreasonableness
  Labour and employment — Human rights complaints — Employer’s failure to respond to Tribunal communications — Tribunal deemed employer to have waived rights to notice and participation — Whether employer’s lack of knowledge of counsel’s failures justified reconsideration — Tribunal’s reliance on Rule 1.22(d) of its Rules of Procedure — Principle that “sins of the lawyer should not be visited upon the client” applied — Tribunal’s decision quashed
  Civil procedure — Default decisions — Reconsideration of default decisions — Contextual analysis — Tribunal failed to consider contextual factors, including employer’s prior participation and lack of knowledge of counsel’s failures — Whether failure to respond to two emails justified inference of abandonment — Ramirez v. Rockwell Automation Canada Ltd., 2025 ONSC 1408 — Tribunal’s decision quashed for lack of contextual analysis
  Labour and employment — Procedural fairness — Tribunal’s reliance on deeming provisions — Whether deeming rule in Rule 1.22(d) unreasonably precluded employer from participating in proceedings — Tribunal’s decision found to be procedurally unfair — Employer’s right to a hearing prioritized over complainant’s reliance on default decision
• 2025-11-28 Paisley & Whitelaw Inc. v. Melloul-Blamey Construction Inc., 2025 ONSC 6533 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: determinations — van — thirty — inclusive — writing
• 2025-11-28 Belova v. Monkhouse Law Professional Corporation, 2025 ONSC 6534 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: respects — thirty — inclusive — costs — writing
• 2025-11-28 Joshi v. Osmi Homes Inc., 2025 ONSC 6537 (CanLII)
  Mots-clés: Civil procedure — Leave to appeal — Costs orders — Motion for leave to appeal costs order of Koehnen J. dismissed — Whether leave to appeal should be granted — Governing principles for granting leave to appeal costs orders — Leave to appeal denied as no error of principle or injustice demonstrated
  Civil procedure — Costs — Motion for leave to appeal dismissed — Costs of $5,000 awarded to responding parties, inclusive — Whether costs award was appropriate — Costs awarded in accordance with standard principles governing costs in civil litigation